Juris Publici Life Style

I started this column to write about political and social issues affecting us in today's society. You will notice my slant is to the right of the liberal/conservative spectrum. Our "lefty," Robin Farkas, takes up the liberal cause. Robin writes on the same topics, but from the opposite viewpoint; a "Crossfire" motif if you will. This commentary is not intended to lecture, only to make us think as people and future lawyers. These words are entirely our opinion and do not reflect the opinion of Juris Publici, T.C. Williams, or the University of Richmond. - Lewis Litsey
 
Flag Burning: Should We Ban It?
 

From the Left . . .
by Robin Farkas

What if... I was cleaning out my attic, and decided to get rid of some old stuff; paper and fabric items, including an old flag. Let's say I brought them downstairs and used them for kindling in my fireplace on a chilly evening. What do you think? Should I be arrested? Fined $1,000? Jailed for a year? After all - I just burned a flag. Sounds a little extreme, doesn't it? But - that's what many think should happen to an American who burns THE FLAG.

I put that in capital letters, because we're not just talking about a tangible item which symbolizes America in a representational way anymore - THE FLAG now is America. When the issue of flag burning comes up, to the majority of us, that piece of colorful fabric becomes THE FLAG. Now, if we were talking about a plastic replica of the Liberty Bell, sheet music to "The Star Spangled Banner," a copy of the Constitution - well, heck, I could desecrate those items all I wanted, but just let me burn THE FLAG - and - well - that ignites some patriotic passions in a very weird way.

The issue of flag burning came to a head in 1984. During the Republican National Convention, some angry protestors doused a flag with kerosene and lit it up, while chanting, "America, the red, white, and blue, we spit on you." This was a very different scene from the hypo I first described. Now we have added an element of anger, protest, public display, and an intense desire to irritate those watching the act. The authorities promptly arrested the flag-burner under a state statute forbidding the desecration of the flag. The flag-burner claimed the law was an unconstitutional restriction of his right of freedom of expression. The case went all the way to the Supreme Court (Texas v. Johnson) and it turned out, in a 5-4 decision, he was right. Justice Brennan delivered the opinion of the Court, in which he said, "If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that Government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable."

A majority of Americans think it's just plain wrong to burn the flag. It's an easy trap to fall into, thinking, "Love America, Love Her Flag." How can you not love America? And if you don't love America, there's the door! Right? Politicians generally love the issue. After all, how many votes are you going to lose by telling voters you think the flag, as a symbol of America, should be held scared? It's like saying, "I don't think evil is a good thing!"

Congress wasn't collectively thrilled with the Court's decision, so they fired the next volley with their Flag Protection Act of 1989. Basically, it tried to do the same thing that state and local laws had tried - but it, too, failed. Once again, the Supreme Court struck it down, saying that "flag burning as a mode of expression enjoys the full protection of the First Amendment."

Flag Burning - Safe Rhetoric

Next, President George Bush called for a constitutional amendment banning flag burning. That stirred everybody up. The House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly in favor of it. [An aside: does it strike you that when an issue is more emotional than logical, the House can make a feel-good vote before sending it on to the Senate, because they know the Senate isn't going to let something ridiculous go through? But.. back to our story..] The Senate couldn't muster the votes to pass a constitutional amendment to ban flag-burning. However, that hasn't entirely stopped the debate, and cautious politicians still like to use the issue as safe rhetoric.

How do our notables on the Right feel about this? Arlen Specter said, "In my judgement, the First Amendment does not protect flag burning." Bob Dole, in his 1996 bid for the presidency, took the opportunity to rip into Bill Clinton for opposing the flag-burning amendment. The Citizens' Flag Alliance equated flag burning with cross burning and book burning. Hey, wait a minute - aren't those things legal? Distasteful, even ignorant... but here in America, we have freedom of expression, don't we? Veterans groups don't want the flag trashed - they say they risked their lives defending it. One Republican gubernatorial (Ohio) nominee George Voinovich, a creative thinker, thought that if the flag manufacturers could just make flags out of fabrics which would become toxic when burned, we could arrest flag burners under air pollution laws. Sometimes the Republicans remind me of the second-born child - not as good, not as smart, but always trying harder. Sigh.

Can We Have It Both Ways?

As for our champions of liberty on the left: President Clinton is against flag desecration but is also against a constitutional amendment banning it. (At first, this sounds like another "but I didn't inhale" argument, but when you think about it, his opinion is the most sound.. read on..) Any constitutional amendment to ban flag burning would necessarily alter the First Amendment protecting freedom of speech. In an 1995 statement, American Bar Association president George E. Bushnell Jr. opposed the idea, saying, ". . . we threaten the fundamental American freedoms of all of us when we start down the dangerous path of amending the Bill of Rights." The American Civil Liberties Union "continues to oppose a proposed constitutional amendment to ‘protect the flag': it would do irreparable harm to the First Amendment and one of the greatest freedoms embodied within it, our freedom to protest and criticize the government."

Here's how I see it: If you were asked to tell a foreigner what's so great about America, what would you describe? You wouldn't describe the flag; you would describe our freedoms! Where else on earth can you utter your complete contempt for your leaders and your government without fear of reprisal? Where else on earth can you be a complete individualist, without impunity? What other society on earth has as great a diversity of thought, culture, and behavior? I don't care what you want to wear, what music you want to hear, what sex toys you like to play with, or what people you want to love or hate. In this country, you can pursue your own brand of life, liberty and happiness.

Flag burning is an issue twisted in the knots of emotionalism. If you look at this rationally, it's just a piece of cloth. Burning it does not cause death, disease, destruction of the nation or even a dent in the fabric of society. Burning the flag is nothing more than a ritual of protest. It is a healthy, legal expression of anger and frustration. This country was founded on the principle of freedom. It's not whether burning the flag is a good thing. What's great about America is that we CAN burn the flag!!

 

. . . From the Right
By Lewis Litsey

The United States Flag, a symbol of our country that millions of people have suffered and died for, should never be legally burned in this country.

Free Speech or Obscene Behavior?

I would be the first person to stand up in defense of freedom of speech, however, there are some actions that are not free political speech but behavior gauged to anger and sadden; burning the United States Flag is one of these actions. The Supreme Court has differentiated between free speech and obscenities and burning a U.S. Flag should be listed as an obscenity. There should be a Constitutional Amendment criminalizing any desecration of the U.S. Flag. Sure, many pinko liberal's may stand up at the mere mention of a Flag Burning Constitutional Amendment and yell "what about our freedom of speech!" "people died for those rights!" Yes they did and what they fought for should not be slowly destroyed.

I agree with freedom of speech and that is why people who, for whatever reason, want to protest against this country can do it by printing pamphlets, magazines, or newspapers. In addition, they can write articles in magazines and newspapers, or form rallies, speeches, and demonstrations. Those same people who hate this country, but live in it, can also write their state and federal Congress-people, sign petitions, get on the public access channel, etc. In other words, there are many, many, many ways to express one's political views while not offending, angering, and saddening people. It can be argued that the manner in which the framers thought United States Citizens would exercise their freedom of speech would be a bit more dignified than a chanting crowd burning a flag. People who burn U.S. Flags in the United States do not have free speech in mind, they only hope to anger and offend others. Free political speech must be just that, political speech, not calculated attempt to offend.

Dying From the Inside Out

Should United States residents and citizens be allowed to desecrate symbols of our Country? Should respect enter into the equation? We all want the United States to be a strong country. We want its citizens to be proud of her accomplishments and proud to be citizens of the most free country the Earth has ever seen. Should we not place the very existence of our country above allowing total freedom to do and act as people please? There must be laws in a society to prevent some citizens taking advantage of others and to maintain order. Some laws sustain our nation and its symbols of pride; a constitutional amendment against flag burning or desecration would accomplish this objective. Allowing people to destroy symbols of our great Country weakens our country from the inside out.

People who do not love or like this country should not live here, they should move. The only actions they take are negative acts, sometimes violent, sometimes not. We must protect ourselves from the many groups who would like to destroy the United States. We must also have laws which engender pride and respect for the United States or young people will grow up having no desire to respect our country and its rich history. Instead, they will grow up respecting entertainers and athletes more than political and military hero's, the very people who sacrificed and died so that we have the freedom we have today. Their blood is on our hands and we owe them a debt that will never be repaid. The least we can do is not destroy the symbols many men and women have sacrificed their lives for.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                           

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                         

 

 

 

 

BackwardPrevious Page

 Front Page

Next PageForward