166 Va. 229

William Taylor Muse Law Library
University of Richmond School of Law

VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT RECORDS & BRIEFS

Previous Case Return to Contents List Next Case

Citation(s): 166 Va. 229 (183 S.E. 873)

Case name: Hunton v. Commonwealth

Court: Supreme Court of Appeals

Record no. 1536

Date of decision: 1936 Jan. 16*

Appealed from: Error to judgment of City of Richmond Hustings Court,

Outcome: Aff.

Opinion(s): Eggleston, J.; diss. Campbell, C.J., & Hudgins, J.*

Briefs: 1. Petition for writ of error & Record (Hunton) [38 (some fold.), (i)].
2. Brief on behalf of the Commonwealth [40].
3. Reply brief by counsel for appellant [iv, 51].
4. Application for rehearing (Commonwealth) [79].
5. Reply brief on behalf of appellant to application for re-hearing [v, 53].
6. Reply brief on behalf of the Commonwealth on rehearing [31].
7. Petition for re-hearing (Hunton) [ii, 37].

Notes: * Original opinion rendered at March term, 1935; rehearing granted at June term, 1935; present opinion handed down at January term, 1936; second rehearing denied at March term, 1936. The dissenting opinion was originally prepared by Justice Epes as the opinion of the court; however, the case was reheard after Justice Epes' death and the decision reversed.

Citation(s):	166 Va. 229 (183 S.E. 873)
Case name:	*Hunton v. Commonwealth*
Court:	Supreme Court of Appeals
Record no.	1536
Date of decision:	1936 Jan. 16*
Appealed from:	Error to judgment of City of Richmond Hustings Court,
Outcome:	Aff.
Opinion(s):	Eggleston, J.; diss. Campbell, C.J., & Hudgins, J.*
Briefs:	1. Petition for writ of error & Record (Hunton) [38 (some fold.), (i)]. 2. Brief on behalf of the Commonwealth [40]. 3. Reply brief by counsel for appellant [iv, 51]. 4. Application for rehearing (Commonwealth) [79]. 5. Reply brief on behalf of appellant to application for re-hearing [v, 53]. 6. Reply brief on behalf of the Commonwealth on rehearing [31]. 7. Petition for re-hearing (Hunton) [ii, 37].
Notes:	* Original opinion rendered at March term, 1935; rehearing granted at June term, 1935; present opinion handed down at January term, 1936; second rehearing denied at March term, 1936. The dissenting opinion was originally prepared by Justice Epes as the opinion of the court; however, the case was reheard after Justice Epes' death and the decision reversed.