Jud Campbell
Professor of Law
-
Profile
Jud Campbell joined the Richmond Law faculty in 2016 after serving as the Executive Director of the Stanford Constitutional Law Center. His academic focus is First Amendment law and constitutional history. His publications include articles in the Yale Law Journal, Stanford Law Review, Texas Law Review, Constitutional Commentary, and Law and History Review. After completing his J.D. at Stanford Law School, he clerked for Judge Diane S. Sykes on the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, and for Judge José A. Cabranes on the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. He holds a bachelor’s degree from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and two master’s degrees from the London School of Economics, where he studied as a Marshall Scholar.
Expand All-
Presentations
Presenter, "Changing Conceptions of the First Amendment," APSA Annual Meeting, American Political Science Association (September 2020)
Presentations Prior to 2019
-
Bar Admissions
Virginia
-
Professional Experience
Professor of Law (2022 - present)
University of Richmond School of Law, Richmond, VAAssociate Professor of Law (2019 - 2022)
University of Richmond School of Law, Richmond, VAAssistant Professor of Law (2016 - 2019)
University of Richmond School of Law, Richmond, VAExecutive Director (2013 - 2016)
Stanford Law School Constitutional Law CenterLaw Clerk for Judge Jose A. Cabranes (2012 - 2013)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitLaw Clerk for Judge Diane S. Sykes (2011 - 2012)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
-
Presentations
-
Publications
Journal Articles
General Citizenship Rights, 132 Yale Law Journal (2023).
The Emergence of Neutrality, 131 Yale Law Journal 861 (2022).
Constitutional Rights Before Realism, 2020 Illinois Law Review 1433 (2020).
Natural Rights, Positive Rights, and the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, 83 Law & Contemporary Problems 31 (2020).
Compelled Subsidies and Original Meaning, 17 First Amendment Law Review 249 (2019).
The Invention of First Amendment Federalism, 97 Texas Law Review 517 (2019).
Testimonial Exclusions and Religious Freedom in Early America, 37 Law & History Review 431 (2019).
Judicial Review and the Enumeration of Rights, 15 Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy 569 (2017).
Natural Rights and the First Amendment, 127 Yale Law Journal 246 (2017).
Republicanism and Natural Rights at the Founding, 32 Constitutional Commentary 85 (2017).
Speech-Facilitating Conduct, 68 Stanford Law Review 1 (2016).
Commandeering and Constitutional Change, 122 Yale Law Journal 1104-1181 (2013).
Religious Neutrality in the Early Republic, 24 Regent University Law Review 311 (2012).
A New Approach to Nineteenth-Century Religious Exemption Cases, 63 Stanford Law Review 973 (2011).
Whiskey, Soldiers, and Voting: Western Virginia Elections in the 1790s, 15 The Smithfield Review 65 (2011).
The Origin of Citizen Genet's Projected Attack on Spanish Louisiana: A Case Study in Girondin Politics, 33 French Historical Studies 515-544 (2010).
The French Intrigue of James Cole Mountflorence, 65 William & Mary Quarterly 779 (2008).
James Cole Mountflorence and the Politics of Diplomacy, 66 Tennessee Historical Quarterly 210 (2007).
Charles Gerrard: Early Benefactor of the University of North Carolina, 83 North Carolina Historical Review 293 (2006).
Book ChaptersFundamental Rights at the American Founding, in Cambridge History of Rights (2022).
Book ReviewsReview of Frank J. Byrne, Becoming Bourgeois: Merchant Culture in the South, 1820-1865, 84 North Carolina Historical Review 103 (2007).
Magazines/Trade PublicationsWhat Did the First Amendment Originally Mean?, Summer Richmond Law Magazine 19 (2018).
-
In the News
Are Amy Coney Barrett’s religious views fair game? (The Christian Science Monitor)
Mon., Sep. 28, 2020Does the ban on large gatherings violate the 1st Amendment of the Constitution (WY Daily)
Tue., Apr. 21, 2020How Courts Have Been Able to Make Law (LongRoom)
Fri., Dec. 6, 2019Justice Breyer brings his pragmatism to Boston (The Huntington News)
Tue., Apr. 3, 2018What if the founders had free speech wrong? (Bloomberg)
Thu., Dec. 14, 2017Who's coming to Richmond on Saturday, what they're protesting and why the city is allowing it - permit or no permit (Richmond Times-Dispatch)
Fri., Sep. 15, 2017